Appeal of St. Paul Table Co.

2 B.T.A. 698
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 30, 1925
DocketDocket No. 2249
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 B.T.A. 698 (Appeal of St. Paul Table Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of St. Paul Table Co., 2 B.T.A. 698 (bta 1925).

Opinion

[699]*699OPINION.

Graupner:

The only issue involved in this appeal is whether the Commissioner erred in refusing to allow as a deduction from income the amount of depreciation which taxpayer claimed it sustained, based on March 1, 1913, values. The deductions for depreciation allowed by the Commissioner were based on cost according to the book values carried by taxpayer and, in the absence of sufficient proof that the books and records maintained by the corporation do not reflect actual investment in plant and buildings, the determination of the Commissioner must be approved.

Arundell not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Paul Table Co. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 698 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 B.T.A. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-st-paul-table-co-bta-1925.