Appeal of Salmon
This text of 3 B.T.A. 838 (Appeal of Salmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[839]*839OPINION.
Whether the taxpayer was a resident or nonresident alien of the United States after May, 1922, is practically a moot question. The return filed by the taxpayer showed gross income of $5,000, against which a personal credit of $2,900 was claimed, leaving taxable income of $2,100, upon which a tax of $84 has previously been assessed. The deficiency determined by the Commissioner is the amount of tax, as he computes it, in excess of the $84 previously assessed. If the taxpayer was a resident throughout the year 1922, as he claims, the deficiency must be disallowed. On the other hand, if the taxpayer became a nonresident in 1922, the Commissioner was in error in including the entire compensation for the year as taxable income to the taxpayer. As a nonresident alien the taxpayer would be taxable only upon such portion of the $5,000 as was paid him for services rendered within the United States, or $2,083.33, being five months’ salary. Deducting from this the exemption of $1,000 allowed a nonresident alien leaves taxable income of $1,083.33, upon which the tax at 8 per cent would be $82.67, or $1.33 less than the amount assessed upon the original return.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 B.T.A. 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-salmon-bta-1926.