Appeal of Roketenetz

451 A.2d 1288, 122 N.H. 869, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 480
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided October 12, 1982·No. No. 82-150·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

The taxpayer received a property tax bill for his real estate in Pelham on November 21, 1980, and on February 6, 1981, he filed a [870]*870request with his town selectmen for an abatement. Unfortunately and regrettably, as often occurs, the selectmen never acted upon the request and, therefore, on May 26, 1981, the taxpayer appealed to the board of taxation. The appeal was dismissed for failure to comply with the terms of RSA 76:16-a I (Supp. 1981). That statute requires that, if the selectmen “neglect or refuse” to abate the tax, an appeal must be taken to the board of taxation within six months after the date of “notice of such tax.”

Even though the notice of appeal to the board of taxation was filed only five days late, this court has previously held that six months means six months, Arlington Am. Sample Book Co. v. Board of Taxation, 116 N.H. 575, 576, 364 A.2d 878, 879 (1976), and we see no reason to overrule that case. The case of Appeal of Wood Flour, Inc., 121 N.H. 991, 437 A.2d 286 (1981), is clearly inapposite.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Roketenetz, 451 A.2d 1288, 122 N.H. 869, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 480 (N.H. 1982).

451 A.2d 1288 (Appeal of Roketenetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal of City of Concord
13 A.3d 287 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2010)
Appeal of Home
816 A.2d 944 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2003)