Appeal of Rethorst

Board of Tax Appeals

Appeal of Rethorst

1 B.T.A. 448

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 1925

DocketDocket No. 221

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 B.T.A. 448 (Appeal of Rethorst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Appeal of Rethorst, 1 B.T.A. 448 (bta 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION.

Ivins :

The war was declared terminated by resolution of Congress for certain purposes, including computation of taxes, on March 3, 1921, and the taxpayer thought that since 61 days of 1921 were thus regarded as prior to the termination of the war, he should be entitled to 61/365 of the $3,500 allowance made in the Revenue Act of 1918. But taxes for the year 1921 must be computed under the Revenue Act of 1921 which, for the purpose of computing income, etc., is retroactive to January 1, 1921. Section 1400 (a) of the 192Í act specifically repealed Title II of the 1918 act as of January 1. 1921. The exemption relied on having been thus repealed, and there being nothing in the Revenue Act of 1921 to justify any such deduction, the Commissioner was correct in disallowing the taxpayer’s claim, and his determination should be approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION.

Ivins :

The war was declared terminated by resolution of Congress for certain purposes, including computation of taxes, on March 3, 1921, and the taxpayer thought that since 61 days of 1921 were thus regarded as prior to the termination of the war, he should be entitled to 61/365 of the $3,500 allowance made in the Revenue Act of 1918. But taxes for the year 1921 must be computed under the Revenue Act of 1921 which, for the purpose of computing income, etc., is retroactive to January 1, 1921. Section 1400 (a) of the 192Í act specifically repealed Title II of the 1918 act as of January 1. 1921. The exemption relied on having been thus repealed, and there being nothing in the Revenue Act of 1921 to justify any such deduction, the Commissioner was correct in disallowing the taxpayer’s claim, and his determination should be approved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 B.T.A. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-rethorst-bta-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack