Appeal of New Martinsville Glass Mfg. Co.

2 B.T.A. 1328
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 11, 1925·No. Docket No. 3906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1329] OPINION.

Marquette:

The motion of the taxpayer for a continuance and the motion of the Commissioner to dismiss for nonprosecution under Rule 18 are each denied. The Commissioner’s answer has admitted that, because of inventory adjustments, the taxpayer’s net income for the fiscal year 1918 should be reduced by $26,529.99 instead of by $12,330.29, as used in computing the deficiency.

Neither party has adduced any competent evidence in support of the issues raised by their respective pleadings. With the exception of the above adjustment, the determination of the Commissioner must be approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of New Martinsville Glass Mfg. Co., 2 B.T.A. 1328 (bta 1925).

2 B.T.A. 1328 (Appeal of New Martinsville Glass Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Martinsville Glass Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 1328 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)