Appeal of Iron City Improvement Co.

4 B.T.A. 305
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJuly 21, 1926
DocketDocket No. 2138
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 B.T.A. 305 (Appeal of Iron City Improvement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Iron City Improvement Co., 4 B.T.A. 305 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[306]*306oiunion.

GREEN:

The taxpayer bases its claim for exhaustion, wear, tear, and obsolescence rate of 5 per cent upon an alleged limited useful life of its building. Several witnesses were produced in its behalf, all of whom testified that in their opinion the useful life of the building was limited to ten years, and that at least by that time it would be economically impractical to operate the building. It is clear that the building is far from modern, that it is poorly localed and that the business of the tenants is steadily falling off. It seems to us that the rate of 5 per cent for exhaustion, wear, tear, and obsolescence, as contended for by the taxpayer is, in the light of all the circumstances, reasonable and proper, and we so hold.

Order of redetermination will he entered on 10 days' notice, under Bule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iron City Improv. Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 305 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-iron-city-improvement-co-bta-1926.