Appeal of Henry Myer Thread Manufacturing Co.

Board of Tax Appeals

Appeal of Henry Myer Thread Manufacturing Co.

2 B.T.A. 665

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedSeptember 28, 1925

DocketDocket No. 3641

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 B.T.A. 665 (Appeal of Henry Myer Thread Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Appeal of Henry Myer Thread Manufacturing Co., 2 B.T.A. 665 (bta 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

[667]*667OPINION.

Marquette:

The Commissioner’s motion to dismiss is denied on authority of Appeal of E. J. Barry, 1 B. T. A. 156; Appeal of Hickory Spinning Co.. 1 B. T. A. 409; and Appeal of Fort Orange Paper Co., 1 B. T. A. 1230.

The payment of $5,000 to Beach during 1918 was made with proper authority and was a legitimate and deductible expense of the taxpayer during that year. The fact that this item was not properly treated on its boobs does not foreclose the taxpayer’s right to deduct it from income, since the books are merely prima facie evidence of the character of the charge. Douglas v. Edwards, 298 Fed. 229, 234.

We are satisfied that the $5,000 was paid in accordance with an obligation of the taxpayer incurred during the year 1918. There being no question of reasonableness of the amount involved, it may properly be deducted from 1918 income.

'Aettndell not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI