Appeal of Hatch & Bailey Co.

1 B.T.A. 25
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided October 24, 1924·No. Docket No. 141·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Geaupner ;

The Commissioner has moved to dismiss the appeal in this case on the ground that it was not filed within 60 days after the mailing of the Commissioner’s notice of deficiency and that, therefore, the Board is without jurisdiction.

The record discloses the following essential facts: The sixtieth day fell upon Sunday, September 7, 1924. Taxpayer’s counsel [26] mailed tbe petition at New York City on Saturday, September 6, and it was not delivered to the office of the Board until Monday, September 8 — 61 days after the Commissioner’s notice of deficiency was mailed to the taxpayer.

The power of the Board to assume jurisdiction in a case such as this has been fully discussed in the Appeal of Sam Satovsky, 1 B. T. A., 22, and, on the authority of that case, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Hatch & Bailey Co., 1 B.T.A. 25 (bta 1924).

1 B.T.A. 25 (Appeal of Hatch & Bailey Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hallmark Research Collective
U.S. Tax Court, 2022
Hatch & Bailey Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 25 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1924)