Appeal of Hall

2 B.T.A. 931
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided October 20, 1925·No. Docket No. 3276·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[933]*933OPINION.

Sternhagen:

Tlie taxpayer introduced in evidence, witli tbe consent of counsel for the Commissioner, several affidavits of persons who purported to be somewhat familiar with the nature and activities of this corporation. The statements of fact contained in these affidavits are not, however, sufficient to enable us to decide whether the corporation comes within the statutory designation of an educational organization. It may be noted in passing that, even although the amount were found to be deductible, there is in the record no evidence of the amount of the bequest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Hall, 2 B.T.A. 931 (bta 1925).

2 B.T.A. 931 (Appeal of Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langfitt v. United States
321 F. Supp. 360 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Hall v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 931 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)