Appeal of Guaranty Trust Co.

3 B.T.A. 459
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJanuary 26, 1926
DocketDocket No. 3272
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 B.T.A. 459 (Appeal of Guaranty Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Guaranty Trust Co., 3 B.T.A. 459 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[461]*461OPINION.

Smith:

In the estate-tax return filed by the Guaranty Trust Co. of New York for Claire Louise Burton, deceased, there was deducted from the gross estate $121,035, upon the ground that this amount was received by the decedent from the estate of her husband, who died less than five years prior to the date of the death of the decedent. The deduction was disallowed by the Commissioner, apparently upon the ground that the $127,035 could not “ be identified as having been acquired in exchange for property ” received from the estate of the decedent’s husband.

The law applicable to the issue involved is section 403 (a) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1921, which permits the deduction from the gross estate of a decedent, in the determination of the net estate, of “ an amount equal to the value of any property forming a part of the gross estate situated in the United States of any person who died within five years prior to the death of the decedent where such property can be identified as having been received by the decedent from such prior decedent by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance, or which can be identified as having been acquired in exchange for property so received.”

In the instant appeal the decedent received from the administrator of the estate of Frank Vincent Burton, in settlement of certain pending lav/ suits, the sum of $127,035. The Board is not informed of the character of these law suits, or whether the amount constituted a “ gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance ” received from the estate of her deceased husband.

On reference to the Board, James did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner
3 B.T.A. 459 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-guaranty-trust-co-bta-1926.