Appeal of Goldbeck
8 A. 29, 4 Sadler 488
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to justify the master’s finding of facts. The learned judge concurred therein. Thus it appears that Doerr complied with the obligation he assumed, to erect a building on the lot conveyed to him. It follows that the decree was correct.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Appeal of Goldbeck, 8 A. 29, 4 Sadler 488 (Pa. 1887).
8 A. 29 (Appeal of Goldbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Magdalera v. Colvin
D. Nevada, 2025
Martin v. Saul
N.D. California, 2021