Appeal of Goldbeck

8 A. 29, 4 Sadler 488
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 17, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The evidence was sufficient to justify the master’s finding of facts. The learned judge concurred therein. Thus it appears that Doerr complied with the obligation he assumed, to erect a building on the lot conveyed to him. It follows that the decree was correct.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Goldbeck, 8 A. 29, 4 Sadler 488 (Pa. 1887).

8 A. 29 (Appeal of Goldbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Magdalera v. Colvin
D. Nevada, 2025
Martin v. Saul
N.D. California, 2021