Appeal of Fogelsville Loan & Building Ass'n

89 Pa. 293, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 142
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 24, 1879·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered, March 24th 1879,

Per Curiam.

There is nothing in any of the Acts of Assembly upon the subject of the revival of judgments which requires that when a judgment is revived, the amount of principal and interest then due should be liquidated. A general judgment upon the scire facias to revive that the judgment be revived for another period of five years is all that is prescribed. Such has been the uniform practice. No doubt it may often be advisable where no interest has been paid on the.debt to ascertain the amount. But the judgment [296] of revival points the subsequent purchaser or encumbrancer directly to the original judgment where the amount is fixed, and a simple calculation ascertains the interest due upon it.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Fogelsville Loan & Building Ass'n, 89 Pa. 293, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 142 (Pa. 1879).

89 Pa. 293 (Appeal of Fogelsville Loan & Building Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank v. Jermyn
63 Pa. D. & C. 569 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1948)
Lambert v. K-Y Transportation Co.
172 A. 180 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Fehr v. Worden
19 Pa. D. & C. 631 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Kistler v. Mosser
21 A. 357 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)