Appeal of Estate of Schwing

3 B.T.A. 697
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedFebruary 13, 1926
DocketDocket No. 3633
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 B.T.A. 697 (Appeal of Estate of Schwing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Estate of Schwing, 3 B.T.A. 697 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[700]*700OPINION.

Geaupner:

The principal question for determination is whether the transfer of 1,160 shares of stock by the decedent to his son and daughter in December, 1919, was a bona -fide sale for a fair consideration or a transfer made in contemplation of death, within the meaning of section 402(c) of the Revenue Act of 1918.

The evidence is that the transferees gave the decedent their notes, each in the amount of $58,000, and deposited the stock certificates as security. The notes were therefore valuable to the extent of the value of the stock given as security, which, from the evidence, was not less than the face of the notes. This, in our opinion, constituted a bona fide sale of the stock, and the transaction is accordingly removed from the operation of the presumption created by section 402(c) of the 1918 Act.

The taxable amount was that of the unpaid balance of the notes which was canceled by the decedent early in February, 1921,'within two weeks prior to his death. The decedent forgave the indebtedness amounting to $81,200, one-half of which, or $40,600, in accordance with the community property law of Louisiana, should be included in the gross estate of the decedent.

In view of this holding, it is unnecessary to determine the value of the stock here involved at the time of the decedent’s death.

[701]*701The deposition of the physician who attended the decedent discloses that he received a check for services rendered, but there - is no evidence' of the- amount of the. check, and the disallowance by the Commissioner of the amount claimed as' a doctor’s fee is approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwing v. Commissioner
3 B.T.A. 697 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-estate-of-schwing-bta-1926.