Appeal of Estate of Pennell

4 B.T.A. 1039
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 25, 1926
DocketDocket No. 2588
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 4 B.T.A. 1039 (Appeal of Estate of Pennell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Estate of Pennell, 4 B.T.A. 1039 (bta 1926).

Opinion

OPINION.

SteRNhagen :

The payment by an individual for general personal legal services, including the preparation of a will, are obviously not “ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business,” as provided in section 214(a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1918. If any part thereof could be so classified the burden of allocation must be on the petitioner and not on the Board. We need not therefore discuss the question whether, since the payment of the entire bill of $20,000 was equally [1040]*1040divided as between 1920 and 1921 without any earmarking, the petitioner could properly allocate the $3,000 entirely to the first payment in 1920.

Judgment for the Commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merians v. Commissioner
60 T.C. 187 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Rosenthal v. Commissioner
1970 T.C. Memo. 332 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Schultz v. Commissioner
50 T.C. 688 (U.S. Tax Court, 1968)
Lansill v. Commissioner
17 B.T.A. 413 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1929)
Pennell v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 1039 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-estate-of-pennell-bta-1926.