Appeal of Enke City Dye Works, Inc.

2 B.T.A. 378
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJuly 15, 1925
DocketDocket No. 976
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 B.T.A. 378 (Appeal of Enke City Dye Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Enke City Dye Works, Inc., 2 B.T.A. 378 (bta 1925).

Opinion

[379]*379OPINION.

Graupner:

In this appeal it is clear that there was a change of ownership after March 3, 1917, and it is equally clear that an interest or control of fifty per cent or more remained in the owner of the predecessor business. The provisions of section 331 of the Eevenue Act of 1918 are therefore applicable, and, under this section, the taxpayer is not entitled to include the claimed item of good will in its invested capital.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enke City Dye Works, Inc. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 378 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 B.T.A. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-enke-city-dye-works-inc-bta-1925.