Appeal of Edmunds

8 A. 31, 4 Sadler 485
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 17, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The decree, procured by Mrs. King legalized the encroachment within the boundaries of the land, which she subsequently conveyed to the appellee. There was, therefore, a clear breach of the covenant contained in her deed, and this decree is correct.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Edmunds, 8 A. 31, 4 Sadler 485 (Pa. 1887).

8 A. 31 (Appeal of Edmunds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Unitarian Society v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co.
142 N.W. 87 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1913)
Ensign v. Colt
52 A. 829 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1902)