Appeal of Bradley

4 B.T.A. 1179
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 29, 1926
DocketDocket No. 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 B.T.A. 1179 (Appeal of Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Bradley, 4 B.T.A. 1179 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[1180]*1180OPINION.

Sternhagen:

The foregoing facts are substantially all that are contained in the record. The Commissioner traversed the depletion deduction in its entirety and thus placed upon the petitioner the burden of proving all the factors of depletion. That the facts are inadequate for this is manifest.

We have made no finding of value on March 1, 1913, because the bare expressions of opinion of the petitioner’s witnesses were not in our opinion sufficiently well founded to tend to establish a value. The witnesses merely said they thought the tracts were worth somewhere from $75 to $100 an acre. Such an opinion can have weight only if there is reason to believe that it is held by one whose general and specific knowledge and whose ability to form an opinion entitle him to speak with some measure of authority.

Although both counsel in brief submit computations of depletion, such computations include factors which are not in evidence — such, for example, as the tonnage of coal mined in the taxable years. Were these facts either proven or stipulated we could consider them; but their mere statement in brief must be disregarded.

Judgment for the Oommissio'ner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradley v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 1179 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 1179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-bradley-bta-1926.