Appeal of Barry

10 A. 126, 6 Sadler 132, 20 Week. No. 26, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 713
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 11, 1887·No. No. 143, E. D.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In passing on the correctness of this decree the tenth item in the will should not be considered alone. Under the preceding items the conclusion reached by the learned court would be clearly right. The effect of those items was to be changed on the happening of the contingency named in the tenth. Inasmuch, however, as that contingency did not happen, the estate previously given remained unchanged, and the decree is correct.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Barry, 10 A. 126, 6 Sadler 132, 20 Week. No. 26, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 713 (Pa. 1887).

10 A. 126 (Appeal of Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gideon v. Fleischmann
66 A.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1949)