Appeal of Alston
11 A. 366, 8 Sadler 451, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 792
Opinion
As to tbe power of the court below to entertain this bill of review we say nothing,' since, on tbe main question, tbat of distribution under tbe will of Samuel Kingan, tbe opinion of tbe ■court below, although brief, is so complete and so fully expresses tbe law governing the controversy in band, tbat we can do nothing better than concur in it.
Appeal dismissed and decree affirmed, at costs of appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Appeal of Alston, 11 A. 366, 8 Sadler 451, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 792 (Pa. 1887).
11 A. 366 (Appeal of Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Crane
2 Coffey 535 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1892)