Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga
625 A.2d 821, 225 Conn. 919, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 152
Opinion
The defendant city of Milford’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 334 (AC 11155), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Where an executrix is removed for cause, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the named successor executors are aggrieved by a Probate Court’s appointment of an administrator, c.t.a.?
“2. Where more than ten years have elapsed since the appointment of an executor, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that General Statutes § 45a-290 (c) requires the appointment of the named successor executors, despite the provisions of General Statutes § 45a-331 which vests the Probate Court with discretion to settle a decedent’s estate?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga, 625 A.2d 821, 225 Conn. 919, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 152 (Colo. 1993).
625 A.2d 821 (Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga
636 A.2d 832 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)