Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga

625 A.2d 821, 225 Conn. 919, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 152

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedApril 13, 1993

DocketSC 14743

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 625 A.2d 821 (Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Appeal from Probate of Bencivenga, 625 A.2d 821, 225 Conn. 919, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 152 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant city of Milford’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 334 (AC 11155), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[920]*920Decided April 13, 1993 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14743. Cynthia C. Anger, assistant city attorney, in support of the petition.

“1. Where an executrix is removed for cause, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the named successor executors are aggrieved by a Probate Court’s appointment of an administrator, c.t.a.?

“2. Where more than ten years have elapsed since the appointment of an executor, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that General Statutes § 45a-290 (c) requires the appointment of the named successor executors, despite the provisions of General Statutes § 45a-331 which vests the Probate Court with discretion to settle a decedent’s estate?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant city of Milford’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 334 (AC 11155), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[920]*920Decided April 13, 1993 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14743. Cynthia C. Anger, assistant city attorney, in support of the petition.

“1. Where an executrix is removed for cause, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the named successor executors are aggrieved by a Probate Court’s appointment of an administrator, c.t.a.?

“2. Where more than ten years have elapsed since the appointment of an executor, did the Appellate Court correctly hold that General Statutes § 45a-290 (c) requires the appointment of the named successor executors, despite the provisions of General Statutes § 45a-331 which vests the Probate Court with discretion to settle a decedent’s estate?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

625 A.2d 821, 225 Conn. 919, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-from-probate-of-bencivenga-conn-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack