APPCO Development, Inc. v. Kuehn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

APPCO Development, Inc. v. Kuehn

217 A.D.2d 938, 631 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8353

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1995·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Koshian, J.). We add only that respondents’ determination denying petitioner a license to operate a mobile home court is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v Planning Bd., 79 NY2d 373, 384; Matter of Pilato v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 155 AD2d 864, 865). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Koshian, J.). We add only that respondents’ determination denying petitioner a license to operate a mobile home court is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v Planning Bd., 79 NY2d 373, 384; Matter of Pilato v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 155 AD2d 864, 865). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

APPCO Development, Inc. v. Kuehn, 217 A.D.2d 938, 631 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

217 A.D.2d 938 (APPCO Development, Inc. v. Kuehn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related