Appalachian Insurance v. General Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Appalachian Insurance v. General Electric Co.

303 A.D.2d 250, 755 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2683

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 250 (Appalachian Insurance v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Appalachian Insurance v. General Electric Co., 303 A.D.2d 250, 755 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered November 4, 2002, which directed defendant-appellant to submit to a two-hour oral examination by telephone rather than require defendant-respondent to attempt first to obtain the information it seeks by means of interrogatories or some other form of written disclosure, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly directed appellant to submit to an [251]*251oral telephonic examination where, among other circumstances, written interrogatories previously served by respondent on appellant went largely unanswered (see Weeks Off. Prods. v Chemical Bank, 178 AD2d 113 [1991]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered November 4, 2002, which directed defendant-appellant to submit to a two-hour oral examination by telephone rather than require defendant-respondent to attempt first to obtain the information it seeks by means of interrogatories or some other form of written disclosure, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly directed appellant to submit to an [251]*251oral telephonic examination where, among other circumstances, written interrogatories previously served by respondent on appellant went largely unanswered (see Weeks Off. Prods. v Chemical Bank, 178 AD2d 113 [1991]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 250, 755 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appalachian-insurance-v-general-electric-co-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack