Appalachian Agency for Sr. Citizens v. Ferguson

902 F.2d 27, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5843, 1990 WL 52753
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 1990
Docket89-2928
StatusUnpublished

This text of 902 F.2d 27 (Appalachian Agency for Sr. Citizens v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appalachian Agency for Sr. Citizens v. Ferguson, 902 F.2d 27, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5843, 1990 WL 52753 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

902 F.2d 27
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
APPALACHIAN AGENCY FOR SENIOR CITIZENS; Mountain Empire
Older Citizens; New River Valley Agency on Aging; District
III Governmental Cooperative; Jefferson Area Board for
Aging, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Wilda FERGUSON, Commissioner, Virginia Department for the
Aging, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-2928.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 9, 1990.
Decided April 13, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen W. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-123-B)

Gerald L. Gray, Gerald L. Gray, P.C., Clintwood, Va., argued, for appellants.

Carol Smith Nance, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee;

Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General, John A. Rupp, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., on brief.

W.D.Va., 702 F.Supp. 1262.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED.

Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens, et al, appeal the district court order granting summary judgment to the defendant and upholding Virginia's formula for distributing Title III funds of the Older Americans Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 3021 et seq. After this appeal was filed, the Virginia Department for the Aging promulgated a new funding formula which supersedes the contested formula.

The promulgation of the new funding formula has rendered this appeal moot. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed and remanded with leave granted for the appellant agencies to file an amended complaint and to submit such further evidence as may be appropriate.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens v. Ferguson
702 F. Supp. 1262 (W.D. Virginia, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
902 F.2d 27, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5843, 1990 WL 52753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appalachian-agency-for-sr-citizens-v-ferguson-ca4-1990.