Apostol v. Bloom
This text of 129 A.D.2d 665 (Apostol v. Bloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lodato, J.), dated June 3, 1986, which [666]*666granted the defendants’ motion to compel her to accept their answer and denied her cross motion for leave to enter a default judgment against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On this record, the Supreme Court did not err or abuse its discretion in opening the defendants’ relatively brief default and compelling the plaintiff to accept their answer. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.2d 665, 514 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apostol-v-bloom-nyappdiv-1987.