Aponte v. State

829 So. 2d 383, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16082, 2002 WL 31465585
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 2002·No. No. 3D02-2848·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Based upon the trial court’s correct and well-reasoned order, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aponte v. State, 829 So. 2d 383, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16082, 2002 WL 31465585 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 383 (Aponte v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aponte v. State
118 So. 3d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)