Aponte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Aponte v. State

595 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3305, 1992 WL 57885

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 1992

DocketNo. 91-01151

StatusPublished

This text of 595 So. 2d 584 (Aponte v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aponte v. State, 595 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3305, 1992 WL 57885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only point raised in this appeal challenges the validity of conditions 6, 9, 10, 18 and 19 which were imposed in the written order of probation. We strike these special conditions of probation because they did not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence imposed at the sentencing hearing. Labar v. State, 584 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Affirmed, except remanded for conformance of the sentence to the oral pronouncement.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only point raised in this appeal challenges the validity of conditions 6, 9, 10, 18 and 19 which were imposed in the written order of probation. We strike these special conditions of probation because they did not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence imposed at the sentencing hearing. Labar v. State, 584 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Affirmed, except remanded for conformance of the sentence to the oral pronouncement.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3305, 1992 WL 57885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aponte-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack