Apollo Steel Co. v. Commissioner

41 F.2d 986, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11034, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2928, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9425, 8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 11
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 1930
DocketNo. 4155
StatusPublished

This text of 41 F.2d 986 (Apollo Steel Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Apollo Steel Co. v. Commissioner, 41 F.2d 986, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11034, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2928, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9425, 8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 11 (3d Cir. 1930).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This ease is affirmed on the case of Cramer and King Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 41 F.(2d) 24, and the question of abnormality was for the Commissioner, not this court, to determine.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cramer & King Co. v. Com'r of Internal Revenue
41 F.2d 24 (Third Circuit, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 F.2d 986, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11034, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2928, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9425, 8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apollo-steel-co-v-commissioner-ca3-1930.