Apolinar-Lopez v. Gonzales
This text of 141 F. App'x 597 (Apolinar-Lopez v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Angel Apolinar-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA’s decision to deny ApolinarLopez’s motion to reopen was not “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.” See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (citation omitted). The BIA acted within its broad discretion in concluding that the additional evidence Apolinar-Lopez presented with his motion to reopen was insufficient to establish eligibility for cancellation of removal. See id.
Apolinar-Lopez’s further contentions lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 F. App'x 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apolinar-lopez-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.