Apfelberg v. Lax

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Apfelberg v. Lax

230 A.D. 865

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Orders denying motions to dismiss amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motions granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the parties to the bond and mortgage contracted in view of the New Jersey statute, and intended that it should apply and be followed in enforcing the contract. Plaintiff not having complied with the provision of the statute relating to filing of notice of this action, her action is, therefore, barred. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders denying motions to dismiss amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motions granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the parties to the bond and mortgage contracted in view of the New Jersey statute, and intended that it should apply and be followed in enforcing the contract. Plaintiff not having complied with the provision of the statute relating to filing of notice of this action, her action is, therefore, barred. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Apfelberg v. Lax, 230 A.D. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

230 A.D. 865 (Apfelberg v. Lax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related