Apfelbaum v. Klutch
This text of 187 Misc. 971 (Apfelbaum v. Klutch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum The recovery on the tenant’s counterclaim must be limited to $1,000 exclusive of interest and costs (2525-7th Ave. Corp., v. Knight, 260 App. Div. 733).
The final order and judgment should be modified by reducing the judgment on the counterclaim to $1,000, with interest and costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
McLaughlin, Edeb and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Order and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 Misc. 971, 66 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apfelbaum-v-klutch-nyappterm-1946.