Apfelbaum v. Apfelbaum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Apfelbaum v. Apfelbaum

171 A. 794, 115 N.J. Eq. 555, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 771

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 12, 1934·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Appellant seeks to be relieved from the payment of alimony under an order dated October 11th, 1933, and an order dated November 9th, 1933, amending the before-mentioned order.

A careful examination of the evidence justifies the order in the sum of $40 per week in favor of the petitioner below.

We think there is no meritorious question which calls for any discussion.

The orders under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchakd, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeseie, Van Buseiee, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Appellant seeks to be relieved from the payment of alimony under an order dated October 11th, 1933, and an order dated November 9th, 1933, amending the before-mentioned order.

A careful examination of the evidence justifies the order in the sum of $40 per week in favor of the petitioner below.

We think there is no meritorious question which calls for any discussion.

The orders under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchakd, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeseie, Van Buseiee, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Apfelbaum v. Apfelbaum, 171 A. 794, 115 N.J. Eq. 555, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 771 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

171 A. 794 (Apfelbaum v. Apfelbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.