Apfel v. Auditore

217 A.D. 724
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Apfel v. Auditore. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 A.D. 457

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the plaintiff’s cause of action is to recover upon an unliquidated claim, it does not come within the provision of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The granting of the motion for summary judgment was, [725]*725therefore, unauthorized. The judgment and orders appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Wagner, JJ. Judgment and orders reversed, wi1h costs, and motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Apfel v. Auditore, 217 A.D. 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

217 A.D. 724 (Apfel v. Auditore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.