Apartment Movers of America, Inc. v. One Beacon Lloyds

170 F. App'x 901
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2006·No. 05-10354·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

We agree with the district court that the slow down in business experienced by the insured, Apartment Movers of America, was not a “necessary suspension of your operations” so as to trigger coverage for loss of business income under defendant’s policy. See Quality Oilfield Products, Inc. v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, 971 S.W.2d 635 (Tex.App.Houston, 1998).

We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Apartment Movers of America, Inc. v. One Beacon Lloyds, 170 F. App'x 901 (5th Cir. 2006).

170 F. App'x 901 (Apartment Movers of America, Inc. v. One Beacon Lloyds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related