Aparin v. County of Gloucester
This text of 783 A.2d 260 (Aparin v. County of Gloucester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dawn E. APARIN, Douglas A. Daniels, Edward Dwyer, Rose Lee Fleming, Joseph F. Gorecki, Elmer Hammel, David R. Hubert, Jr., Robert H. Johnson, Adrian Lugo, Jr. and George W. Wagner, Jr., Plaintiffs/Respondents,
v.
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER and Board of Chosen Freeholders of Gloucester County, Defendants/Appellants.
County of Gloucester and Board of Chosen Freeholders of Gloucester County, Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
New Jersey Department of Personnel Janice Mitchell Mintz, Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Personnel, Third-Party Defendants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Joseph T. Carney, Westmont, argued the cause for appellants (Brown & Connery, attorneys; William M. Tambussi, of counsel, Mr. Carney on the brief).
Thomas H. Ward, Princeton, argued the cause for respondents (Albertson Ward, attorneys; Mr. Ward on the brief).
Before Judges WALLACE, JR., CARCHMAN and WELLS.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Holston in his opinion reported at N.J.Super. 41, 783 A.2d 271 (Law Div.2001). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
783 A.2d 260, 345 N.J. Super. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aparin-v-county-of-gloucester-njsuperctappdiv-2001.