Apag, Inc. v. United Stated

U.S. Customs Court

Apag, Inc. v. United Stated

58 Cust. Ct. 163

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 13, 1967

DocketC.D. 2918

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 163 (Apag, Inc. v. United Stated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Apag, Inc. v. United Stated, 58 Cust. Ct. 163 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and the protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, Judge:

When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and the protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cust. Ct. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apag-inc-v-united-stated-cusc-1967.