APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA
This text of APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA (APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
APACHE STRONGHOLD, a 501(c)(3) No. 21-15295 nonprofit organization, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00050-SPL Plaintiff-Appellant, District of Arizona, Phoenix v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); RANDY MOORE, Chief, USDA Forest Service; NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest; TOM TORRES, Acting Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest,
Defendants-Appellees.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apache-stronghold-v-usa-ca9-2022.