APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 F.4th 608
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2022·No. 21-15295·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APACHE STRONGHOLD, a 501(c)(3) No. 21-15295 nonprofit organization, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00050-SPL Plaintiff-Appellant, District of Arizona, Phoenix

v.

ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); RANDY MOORE, Chief, USDA Forest Service; NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest; TOM TORRES, Acting Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA, (9th Cir. 2022).

APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA (APACHE STRONGHOLD V. USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.