A.P. v. Tadlock

Supreme Court of Louisiana

A.P. v. Tadlock

150 So. 3d 886, 2014 La. LEXIS 2406, 2014 WL 5509605

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 31, 2014·No. No. 2014-C-1387·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

hWrit granted. Because we find the plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated there remain genuine issues of material fact, the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law [887] pursuant to La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 966. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the matter is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

VICTORY, J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny. CLARK, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

hWrit granted. Because we find the plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated there remain genuine issues of material fact, the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law [887] pursuant to La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 966. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the matter is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

VICTORY, J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny. CLARK, J., would deny.

A.P. v. Tadlock, 150 So. 3d 886, 2014 La. LEXIS 2406, 2014 WL 5509605 (La. 2014).

Pincite

150 So. 3d 886 (A.P. v. Tadlock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.