A.P. v. Tadlock

Supreme Court of Louisiana

A.P. v. Tadlock

150 So. 3d 886, 2014 La. LEXIS 2406, 2014 WL 5509605

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 31, 2014

DocketNo. 2014-C-1387

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 3d 886 (A.P. v. Tadlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.P. v. Tadlock, 150 So. 3d 886, 2014 La. LEXIS 2406, 2014 WL 5509605 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

hWrit granted. Because we find the plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated there remain genuine issues of material fact, the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law [887]*887pursuant to La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 966. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the matter is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

VICTORY, J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny. CLARK, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

hWrit granted. Because we find the plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated there remain genuine issues of material fact, the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law [887]*887pursuant to La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 966. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the matter is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

VICTORY, J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny. CLARK, J., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 So. 3d 886, 2014 La. LEXIS 2406, 2014 WL 5509605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ap-v-tadlock-la-2014.