A.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.P. v. State

89 So. 3d 305, 2012 WL 2148151, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9598

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 14, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-5899

StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 3d 305 (A.P. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.P. v. State, 89 So. 3d 305, 2012 WL 2148151, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9598 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, A.P. argues that the trial court erred in denying the defense motions [306]*306for continuance and new trial which were based on the inability of A.P.’s mother to attend the adjudicatory hearing due to her hospitalization. The state properly concedes error. We, therefore, reverse the order adjudicating A.P. delinquent and remand for a new hearing. See J.R. v. State, 923 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, A.P. argues that the trial court erred in denying the defense motions [306]*306for continuance and new trial which were based on the inability of A.P.’s mother to attend the adjudicatory hearing due to her hospitalization. The state properly concedes error. We, therefore, reverse the order adjudicating A.P. delinquent and remand for a new hearing. See J.R. v. State, 923 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 So. 3d 305, 2012 WL 2148151, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ap-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack