A.P. v. State
89 So. 3d 305, 2012 WL 2148151, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9598
Opinion
In this appeal, A.P. argues that the trial court erred in denying the defense motions [306] for continuance and new trial which were based on the inability of A.P.’s mother to attend the adjudicatory hearing due to her hospitalization. The state properly concedes error. We, therefore, reverse the order adjudicating A.P. delinquent and remand for a new hearing. See J.R. v. State, 923 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A.P. v. State, 89 So. 3d 305, 2012 WL 2148151, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9598 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
89 So. 3d 305 (A.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J.R. v. State
923 So. 2d 1269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)