A.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.P. v. State

760 So. 2d 1010, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7201, 2000 WL 763321

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 14, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-3065

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 760 So. 2d 1010 (A.P. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.P. v. State, 760 So. 2d 1010, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7201, 2000 WL 763321 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While being investigated as a possible runaway, the juvenile respondent gave a false last name to the interrogating police officer, thus requiring further inquiry to ascertain her identity. We conclude that these facts justify the finding that she was guilty of resisting an officer without violence, notwithstanding that she told the officer her correct name after he had already discovered it. § 843.02, Fla. Stat. (1999); In re J.H., 559 So.2d 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While being investigated as a possible runaway, the juvenile respondent gave a false last name to the interrogating police officer, thus requiring further inquiry to ascertain her identity. We conclude that these facts justify the finding that she was guilty of resisting an officer without violence, notwithstanding that she told the officer her correct name after he had already discovered it. § 843.02, Fla. Stat. (1999); In re J.H., 559 So.2d 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

760 So. 2d 1010, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7201, 2000 WL 763321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ap-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack