Aoelua v. Tagoa'i

2 Am. Samoa 2d 104
High Court of American Samoa·Decided March 20, 1986·No. AP No. 020-85·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a decision in a matai case rendered by four Samoan Associate Judges, Chief Justice Gardner presiding. The standard of appellate review of judicial findings of fact is the "clearly erroneous" standard set forth in United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948).

Appellant takes umbrage with the Court’s finding that Leuea is the only clan of the Aoelua family. It doesn't matter whether there is or is not only one clan in this family since the Court found both candidates had equal family support. The title was awarded on the finding, purely subjective, that appellee was of greater value to the family and village. There was ample testimony to support that finding and it was not clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aoelua v. Tagoa'i, 2 Am. Samoa 2d 104 (amsamoa 1986).

2 Am. Samoa 2d 104 (Aoelua v. Tagoa'i) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
333 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1948)