A.O. Textile Inc. v. Sep Plus Inc.
57 A.D.3d 397, 868 N.Y.2d 892
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2008
StatusPublished
This text of 57 A.D.3d 397 (A.O. Textile Inc. v. Sep Plus Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
A.O. Textile Inc. v. Sep Plus Inc., 57 A.D.3d 397, 868 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
Plaintiff failed to establish as a matter of law that defendants either agreed with its statement of the balance of the indebtedness or admitted to owing a lesser amount (see Herrick, Feinstein v Stamm, 297 AD2d 477, 478 [2002]). Concur — Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, McGuire, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Herrick, Feinstein LLP v. Stamm
297 A.D.2d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 397, 868 N.Y.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ao-textile-inc-v-sep-plus-inc-nyappdiv-2008.