ANZAGEN BLACK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANZAGEN BLACK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (ANZAGEN BLACK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 9, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-0571 Lower Tribunal No. F14-15090 ________________
Anzagen Black, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Soliz v. State, 18 So. 3d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
(concluding probationer willfully violated probation terms when evidence
submitted established probationer “had twenty-one ‘bracelet gone
notifications’ and ten insufficient battery alarms”); Palma v. State, 830 So. 2d
201, 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (affirming trial court’s finding that defendant
willfully violated probation where, despite her allegations of mental illness,
defendant had history of violating her probation); see also Harris v. State,
898 So. 2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (determining competent,
substantial evidence supported trial court’s finding of willful probation
violation notwithstanding defendant’s limited intellectual capabilities).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANZAGEN BLACK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anzagen-black-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.