Anyanwu v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AT SEATTLE JEFFERSONKING ANYANWU, Petitioner, C24-0964 TSZ v. MINUTE ORDER ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, Respondent.
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Petitioner’s Motion to Enforce, docket no. 23, is DENIED. The Court’s prior Order, docket no. 17, required Respondent to provide an individualized bond hearing in accordance with Singh v. Holder, 638 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 2011), and the Court found that Respondent complied with that directive and closed the case, see docket no. 22. The relief granted was limited and did not include ongoing judicial supervision or review of the outcome of the bond hearing. To the extent Petitioner challenges the application of the burden of proof by the Immigration Judge, such claims must be raised through appropriate immigration or appellate proceedings. (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to Petitioner pro se. Nothing shall be docketed in this case after entry of this Minute Order absent prior approval by the Court. Dated this 11th day of April, 2025. Ravi Subramanian Clerk s/Laurie Cuaresma Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anyanwu v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director (Anyanwu v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.