Anusie-Howard v. Todd

615 F. App'x 119
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2015·No. No. 15-1343·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tanya Anusie-Howard appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her claims alleging violations of the Family Medical Leave Act. We have reviewed the record, including the district court’s opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anusie-Howard v. Todd, No. l:12-cv-00199-WDQ, 2015 WL 857360 (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2013, Nov. 18, 2013, and Feb. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anusie-Howard v. Todd, 615 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2015).

615 F. App'x 119 (Anusie-Howard v. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related