Antwoyn Spencer v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-3490 ___________________________

Antwoyn Terrell Spencer

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States Bureau of Prisons; Warden J. Fikes; Captain Warlick; Lieutenant Weber; Lieutenant Daniel Gravdahl; Officer G. White

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: April 6, 2022 Filed: April 11, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Antwoyn Spencer appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se civil rights action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, then United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now United States District Judge.

-2-