Antwon Parker v. David Fortner

440 F. App'x 372
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 8, 2011
Docket11-40188
StatusUnpublished

This text of 440 F. App'x 372 (Antwon Parker v. David Fortner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antwon Parker v. David Fortner, 440 F. App'x 372 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Proceeding pro se and informa pauper-is, Antwon Parker, Texas prisoner # 1311517, appeals from the dismissal of five of the nine defendants to his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights action. Our jurisdiction is limited to appeals from “final decisions of the district courts”. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “[A]ny decision that adjudicates the liability of fewer than all the parties does not terminate the action unless the district court (1) expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay and (2) expressly directs the entry of judgment”. Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1245 (5th Cir.1985) (citing Fed.R.CivP. 54(b)).

The district court’s order did not dispose of Parker’s claims against all defendants and did not provide for an appeal under Rule 54(b). Accordingly, that order is not a final judgment; and, therefore, our court lacks jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal.

DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wordy Jack Thompson, Jr. v. Judge Charles O. Betts
754 F.2d 1243 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 F. App'x 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antwon-parker-v-david-fortner-ca5-2011.