Antuna v. Peisach

575 So. 2d 753, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1619, 1991 WL 26819
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1243
StatusPublished

This text of 575 So. 2d 753 (Antuna v. Peisach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antuna v. Peisach, 575 So. 2d 753, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1619, 1991 WL 26819 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1204-1205 (Fla.1980); Azzarelli v. Pupello, 555 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Alfrey v. Alfrey, 553 So.2d 393 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Payne v. Payne, 481 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); § 61.16, Fla.Stat. (1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Alfrey v. Alfrey
553 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Azzarelli v. Pupello
555 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Payne v. Payne
481 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 So. 2d 753, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1619, 1991 WL 26819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antuna-v-peisach-fladistctapp-1991.