Antuna v. Peisach

575 So. 2d 753, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1619, 1991 WL 26819
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1991·No. No. 90-1243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1204-1205 (Fla.1980); Azzarelli v. Pupello, 555 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Alfrey v. Alfrey, 553 So.2d 393 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Payne v. Payne, 481 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); § 61.16, Fla.Stat. (1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antuna v. Peisach, 575 So. 2d 753, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1619, 1991 WL 26819 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

575 So. 2d 753 (Antuna v. Peisach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Alfrey v. Alfrey
553 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Azzarelli v. Pupello
555 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Payne v. Payne
481 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)