Antron Rammel Blaylock v. State
This text of Antron Rammel Blaylock v. State (Antron Rammel Blaylock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-05-00210-CR
ANTRON RAMMEL BLAYLOCK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court
Upshur County, Texas
Trial Court No. 13,170
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Antron Rammel Blaylock appeals from his conviction for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance. He was sentenced to sixty-five years' confinement. Sentence was imposed April 12, 2005, and Blaylock timely filed a motion for new trial May 2, 2005. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a).
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that a notice of appeal must be filed with the trial court within ninety days after the day sentence was imposed or suspended in open court if the defendant timely filed a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). Blaylock's notice of appeal was due July 11, 2005. Blaylock filed his notice of appeal with the trial court clerk August 12, 2005, 122 days after the trial court imposed sentence.
Because Blaylock's notice of appeal was filed 122 days after the date sentence was imposed, it was not timely filed. We therefore lack jurisdiction over the appeal. Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).
We dismiss Blaylock's appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: September 22, 2005
Date Decided: September 23, 2005
Do Not Publish
s filed, April 11, 2002, is incorrect and the suit was actually filed on January 5, 2001. Thus, the action was not barred by either the four- or the six-year statute of limitations. See Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 3.118 (Vernon 2002); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.004(3) (Vernon 2002).
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
William J. Cornelius*
*Chief Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment
Date Submitted: April 20, 2004
Date Decided: June 30, 2004
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Antron Rammel Blaylock v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antron-rammel-blaylock-v-state-texapp-2005.