Antrobus v. Moreland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Antrobus v. Moreland

456 S.W.3d 517, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 258, 2015 WL 1119608

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2015·No. No. ED 101299·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Antrobus appeals from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict assigning zero fault to each party and awarding Antrobus no damages on his negligence claims. Antrobus seeks plain error review of this judgment, arguing that the verdict finding zero fault by either party should not have been accepted by the trial court. We find no error, plain or otherwise.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Antrobus appeals from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict assigning zero fault to each party and awarding Antrobus no damages on his negligence claims. Antrobus seeks plain error review of this judgment, arguing that the verdict finding zero fault by either party should not have been accepted by the trial court. We find no error, plain or otherwise.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Antrobus v. Moreland, 456 S.W.3d 517, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 258, 2015 WL 1119608 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 517 (Antrobus v. Moreland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.