Antoskow v. Saxe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Antoskow v. Saxe

308 S.E.2d 418, 168 Ga. App. 41, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2669

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 19, 1983

Docket66352

StatusPublished

This text of 308 S.E.2d 418 (Antoskow v. Saxe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antoskow v. Saxe, 308 S.E.2d 418, 168 Ga. App. 41, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Appellants filed suit against appellee Saxe and others to recover medical expenses and the cost of automobile repairs allegedly resulting from the defendants’ negligence. Appellants’ motion for a default judgment against Saxe was granted due to his failure to appear for trial. A jury trial was then held to determine damages and the jury returned a verdict for Saxe. Appellants’ motion for a new trial on the general grounds was denied, and they appeal.

[42]*42Decided September 19, 1983. Dana A. Azar, Louis T. Isaf, for appellants. Allie S. Edwards, Bruce H. Beerman, Harry A. Sneed, for appellees.

No transcript of the trial has been filed in this court and the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial is not erroneous as a matter of law. Hence, we must affirm the trial court’s judgment. McAllister v. City of Jonesboro, 242 Ga. 95 (249 SE2d 565) (1978). See also Fredd v. Randolph, 144 Ga. App. 756 (242 SE2d 301) (1978).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Pope, J, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI